IPL 2024 orange cap: Virat Kohli, purple cap: Harshal Patel

Which players are the highest run-scorers and wicket-takers in the 2024 IPL?

ESPNcricinfo staffUpdated on 27-May-2024Who is the orange cap holder in the 2024 IPL?Virat Kohli is the highest run-scorer in the 2024 IPL. He finished the season on 741 runs after scoring 33 in Royal Challengers Bengaluru’s defeat in the Eliminator against Rajasthan Royals. In second place is Ruturaj Gaikwad, Chennai Super Kings’ captain, who finished his season with 583 runs. At No. 3 is Riyan Parag of Royals, who added only six runs to his tally in his team’s loss in the second Qualifier, against Sunrisers Hyderabad. Travis Head of SRH, who was out for a first-ball duck in the IPL final against Kolkata Knight Riders, is next, with 567 runs.

Abhishek Sharma of SRH leads the way on strike rate among the top 20 run-makers, with 204.21 from 16 games, and has hit the most sixes, 42. Head has the second-best strike rate among the top 20, 191.55, and KKR’s Phil Salt is third with 182. Jake Fraser-McGurk, ranked 29th among the run-scorers, has a strike rate of 234.04 from nine games.Jos Buttler is the leading century-maker in this year’s IPL, with two hundreds. Marcus Stoinis’ 124 not out against CSK is the highest individual score of the season. Three batters among the top four run-scorers have made a hundred apiece, and so have Shubman Gill and Sai Sudharsan of Gujarat Titans, Suryakumar Yadav and Rohit Sharma of Mumbai Indians, Sunil Narine, Will Jacks of RCB, Yashasvi Jaiswal of Royals, and Jonny Bairstow of Punjab Kings. Kohli, Samson and RCB’s Rajat Patidar lead in terms of half-centuries, with five each; Heinrich Klaasen, Faf du Plessis, Venkatesh Iyer, KL Rahul, Gaikwad, Head, Parag, Salt and Fraser-McGurk have made four fifties each.Here’s the full list of the highest run-scorers in the 2024 IPL.Who is the purple cap holder in the 2024 IPL?Punjab Kings seamer Harshal Patel finished the 2023 IPL on top of the highest wicket-takers’ list, with 24 wickets at an economy of 9.73.In second place is KKR legspinner Varun Chakravarthy, who took 1 for 9 from his two overs in the final, to finish the season with 21 wickets at an economy of 8.04. MI’s Jasprit Bumrah is third with 20 wickets at a stunning economy of 6.48, followed by KKR’s Andre Russell, whose 3 for 19 in the final propelled him into the top ten. He leads a batch of five bowlers on 19 apiece, including his team-mate Harshit Rana, who took 2 for 24 in the final, SRH’s T Natarajan, Arshdeep Singh of PBKS, and Avesh Khan of Royals.Yuzvendra Chahal, who held the purple cap for a significant period earlier in the season before falling out of the top ten finishes on 18 wickets, at No. 9.

Three bowlers have taken five-fors so far this season – Bumrah, Yash Thakur of LSG, and Sandeep Sharma of Royals. Ten bowlers – Kuldeep Yadav, Natarajan, Mustafizur Rahman, Arshdeep, Deshpande, Matheesha Pathirana, Gerald Coetzee, R Sai Kishore, Mitchell Starc and Josh Little – have taken four in an innings.Only four spinners feature in the top 20: Chahal, Kuldeep of DC, Narine, and Chakravarthy.Narine has the second-best economy rate after Bumrah among the top 20 wicket-takers, 6.90, and Chakravarthy the third best, 8.04.Here’s the full list of the highest wicket-takers in the 2024 IPL.

'Light years ahead' – Carli Lloyd says USWNT behind European powers such as Spain and England, despite 2024 Olympic gold

The USWNT legend expressed skepticism about the national team's standing, suggesting European nations have surpassed them

  • Lloyd ranks USWNT behind Spain, England
  • Says American squad has "a bit more to prove"
  • Says Spain is "light years ahead" in development
  • TST

    WHAT HAPPENED

    With England outlasting Spain for the Euro 2025 title on Sunday, former USWNT star Carli Lloyd said that – even coming off a 2024 Olympic gold medal – Emma Hayes' side is still behind European nations on a global scale.

    “It's an interesting debate,” Lloyd said on the State of the Union podcast. “After watching this tournament, I mean, even teams like Switzerland, Italy, you know, Italy, you could argue that they had a little bit of an easier path to get to the semiinal, but they still came out brave. They were tactically flexible. They played really, really well.

    “And so, yeah, it kind of got my wheels turning a bit to think about our current US women's national team, where they're at right now. I know that they had just won the Olympics. I still think they're hovering currently right now, third or fourth behind Spain, England – you could throw in Sweden than there."

  • Advertisement

  • WHAT LLOYD SAID

    Lloyd emphasized that while Hayes is working to improve the squad, the team still has significant ground to make up compared to their European counterparts

    “I mean, Germany down, down 10 men. Their epic performance was pretty amazing," she said. "But I do still think that there's a bit to go. There's a bit there's a bit more to prove to me. You know what they have as far as the depth. And I know Emma's spending a lot of time getting a lot of different players minutes and caps and doing all that to build the 2027. But Europe is in a really, really good position right now. I mean, Spain is undeniably the best. I think they are light years ahead as far as a playing style.”

  • THE BIGGER PICTURE

    FIFA released its latest Women's World Ranking last month, with the United States maintaining their top position. The gap between the Americans and their closest challengers narrowed, with Spain (second) and Germany (third) rising.

    Brazil, which split two matches with the USWNT this spring, moved into fourth place, representing a substantial four-position climb in the rankings.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images Sport

    WHAT’S NEXT?

    The USWNT are focused on developing ahead of the 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup. They’ll face Portugal twice in October and then a to-be-determined opponent at the CPKC Stadium.

The Lara story in numbers

Numbers might not do full justice to the genius that is Brian Lara, but they do offer a offer a good indication of his vast talents

S Rajesh26-Nov-2005


Brian Lara reacts to run number 11,175
© Getty Images

Numbers might not do full justice to the genius that is Brian Lara, but they do offer a offer a good indication of his vast talents. Over a career which has so far spanned 15 years, Lara has scored runs against allcomers in all parts of the globe, and against the best bowling attacks. The mantle of highest run-getter in Test history sits easily on him.Lara’s career summary indicates that he has been most prolific against Sri Lanka, but the runs have come at a fair rate against almost every team – the only disappointment is his sub-40 average against India in 13 Tests.Unlike a Sachin Tendulkar or a Jacques Kallis, consistency hasn’t been Lara’s forte, but when he’s been in the mood, he has run up some amazing streaks. His progression chart to his 11,000-plus runs tells the story: a smashing start to his Test career, followed by lean patches in 1997-98 and 2000-01 – he needed 30 Tests to move from 3000 to 5000 runs – but some outstanding spells thereafter.


Lara’s progression to the world record
Runs Tests Average 100s/ 50s
1000 13 52.76 2/ 7
2000 22 56.91 4/ 11
3000 31 60.96 7/ 16
4000 45 54.10 10/ 20
5000 61 50.87 11/ 27
6000 73 49.21 15/ 30
7000 83 50.49 18/ 34
8000 94 50.34 20/ 40
9000 101 52.69 24/ 43
10,000 111 52.91 26/ 45
11,000 121* 54.04 31/ 46

Almost throughout his career, though, Lara has been saddled with a team which is among the weakest in the history of West Indian cricket. The result – a string of defeats with Lara invariably playing a lone hand. He has been involved in a staggering 57 losses, and nearly 44% of all his runs have been scored in these games. As the table below shows, Lara’s tally of 4797 runs in defeats is well clear of the second-placed Alec Stewart, while no other batsman has scored two double-hundreds in losing causes. With the current West Indies team struggling in Australia, you wouldn’t want to bet against more that tally going up to three by the time this Test is done.

























































Most runs in defeats Tests Runs Ave 100s/ 50s
Brian Lara 57 4797 42/08 12/ 21
Alec Stewart
54 2993 29.93 0/ 23
Allan Border 46 2771 33.39 5/ 13
Shivnarine Chanderpaul
43 2744 34.73 3/ 17
Andy Flower 34 2713 43.06 7/ 15
David Gower
42 2581 32.26 4/ 15
Sachin Tendulkar 35 2558 36.54 8/ 9
More proof of Lara’s lone-ranger acts – he has scored more than 40% of the team runs on 20 separate occasions – the latest one being his effort at Adelaide. The highest percentage contribution was when he scored 375 out of a team total of 593 – an amazing 63.24% – against England at Antigua in 1993-94.


Highest contributions by Lara to team totals
Lara’s score Team total Percentage Match
375 593 for 5 63.24 England, Antigua, 1993-94
176 296 59.46 South Africa, Barbados, 2004-05
221 390 56.67 Sri Lanka, Colombo, 2001-02
196 347 56.48 South Africa, Trinidad, 2004-05
226 405 55.80 Australia, Adelaide, 2005-06
400* 751 for 5 53.26 England, Antigua, 2003-04
79 152 for 9 51.97 England, The Oval, 2004

In all, Lara has scored 20.42% of all runs scored by West Indies in the 119 games he has played for them (excluding the ongoing Adelaide Test). To give you an idea of the lack of support he’s had to deal with, the corresponding figure for Viv Richards was 15.23%, for Garry Sobers 16.17%, while among the current players, Sachin Tendulkar has scored 17.18% of the runs scored by India, and Inzamam-ul-Haq 16.24% for Pakistan. Lara’s contributions have come almost equally in victories and defeats – 20.05% in wins and 19.82% in losses.The weak West Indian outfit has also meant that Lara has ended up batting twice in a Test more often than most other batsmen, ensuring that it’s only taken him 121 Tests to get to the mark that took Allan Border 156. Sachin Tendulkar has played a couple of matches more, but is still more than 1000 runs short of Border.Like all great batsmen, the best time to get Lara is early in his innings – once he gets a start, he makes it count more often than not. In the 127 innings when he has passed 20, Lara has scored 81.42 runs per innings (including not-outs). Among the batsmen who have at least 20 scores of more than 20, only two batsmen have done better. Also, apart from Don Bradman, no batsman has scored as many as Lara’s eight double-centuries.


Runs/ inn. when batsmen score more than 20
Batsman Runs Innings Runs/ innings
Don Bradman 6858 58 118.07
George Headley 2069 24 86.21
Brian Lara 10,566 128 82.55
Dennis Amiss 3257 40 81.42
Virender Sehwag 3083 38 81.13
Sachin Tendulkar 9535 118 80.81

Tight Ashes Tests

A look back to ten of the closest finishes between cricket’s oldest rivals, England and Australia

Will Luke11-Aug-2005


Bob Willis’s staggering 8 for 43 is often overshadowed by Ian Botham’s performance, in the famous Headingley ’81 Test
© Getty Images

Sixth Test, 1997, The Oval
“Too late to rescue the Ashes, but not too late to rescue their self-respect,” said Wisden of the sixth and final Test in the 1997 series. Despite winning the first Test, convincingly, England were overwhelmed by the Antipodeans in the remainder of the series; the Ashes were lost and so, it appeared, were England. The recall of Phil Tufnell proved inspired. He decimated a batting lineup which had been so fiercely dominant throughout the series, taking 11 wickets in the match. Set just 124 runs to win, Tufnell and Caddick tore into Australia, to at last defy Australia by 19 runs, and momentarily restore English cricket’s wobbling status.
Third Test, 1981, Headingley
Headingley, 1981; the biggest pinch in Ashes history. On the fourth day, following on, England creaked to 135 for 7 and Ladbrokes, famously, offered odds of 500-1 against them. They hadn’t, however, wagered on Ian Botham and Bob Willis producing runs and wickets as though their lives depended on it. Willis’s 8 for 43 was the most staggering performance of his life, as he matched Botham’s nation-binding efforts a few hours previously. Australia only needed 130 to win, yet fell short by just 18 runs to square the series. The similarities between this and Edgbaston last Sunday are obvious yet spine-tingling in their resonance.First Test, 1886-87, Sydney
In 1887, only five years after it all began, one of the first classic Ashes matches took place in Sydney. Put into bat by Percy “Greatheart” McDonnell, England were devastated by Charles Turner’s fast-medium off-breaks. Indeed, Turner’s nickname, “The Terror,” was perfectly apt for this match as he bowled England out for just 45, which remains England’s lowest Test score. They faired slightly better in the second innings but, even despite the last three wickets extending England’s lead to 111, Australia were firm favourites going into day three. Billy Barnes had other ideas, though, taking 6 for 28 from 46 overs, of which, astonishingly, 29 were maidens. Ably supported by Surrey’s George Lohmann, playing in only his fourth Test, England scraped home by 13 runs.


A brilliant century on debut for Archie Jackson wasn’t enough for Australia in 1929
© Cricinfo Ltd.

Fourth Test, 1928-29, Adelaide
England had already won the Ashes come the fourth Test in the 1928-29 series. Yet, as Wisden commented, “they did not exhibit any lack of keenness.” Wally Hammond was instrumental, striking a hundred in each innings and taking his run aggregate to 851 runs in four matches. Australia were indebted to Archie Jackson, who struck the ball sweetly to score a hundred on debut. His innings was, as described by Wisden, “in point of style and beauty of execution and strokeplay, the best innings played against the Englishmen during the whole tour.” Brilliant though Jackson was, Australia stumbled in their second innings. At the start of seventh day of the match, 89 runs were required and the Don was still at the crease. But his wicket, a cruel run-out, signalled the end for Australia and England crept home by 12 runs.Fourth Test, 1998-99, Melbourne
Widely pilloried before the fourth Test of the 1998-99 series, England responded with heart and never let Australia get too far away. England’s talisman of the 1990s, Darren Gough, restricted Australia’s run-machines to a relatively modest 340 in their first innings. Yet, despite Alec Stewart’s second bolshy half-century in the match, Australia’s target of 175 was seemingly none too tricky. Dean Headley – wicketless in the first innings – bowled with a demonic possession to take 6 for 60, to banish all suggestions of a 5-0 Ashes whitewash. The catalyst of Headley’s inspirational spell was Mark Ramprakash’s catch to dismiss Langer, who was well set on 30 – a spectacular diving effort from a vicious pull shot. Headley scented an unlikely upset and, cheered on by a particularly barmy Barmy Army, bowled with pace and hostility to produce a mini-spell of four for four in 13 balls. The last three Australian batsmen only lasted three balls, two falling to Gough whose tribal-dance celebrations demonstrated the importance of a rare victory on Australian soil, by just 12 runs.


Jack Blackham’s 74 wasn’t enough to defy England a famous victory in 1894
© ACB

First Test, 1894-95, Sydney
One of the strangest Ashes turnabouts of all time occurred in 1894 at the SCG. Choosing to bat, Australia compiled a mammoth score of 586, with Syd Gregory making a career-best 201. The captain, Jack Blackham at No. 10, who was playing in his final Test, also hit a career-best 74 and together with Gregory hit a record ninth-wicket partnership of 154 in just an hour-and-a-quarter. England’s first-innings reply was feeble, but they followed on to place unanticipated pressure on Australia in the fourth innings, as overnight rain turned the pitch into a quagmire. On the fifth evening, Australia only required a further 64 runs to win. Indeed, several of England’s players had thought the match lost and relaxed accordingly, including Bobby Peel. Stoddard was having none of this defeatist talk, and ordered Peel under a cold shower. It had the desired effect: he ran through Australia’s batting on the sixth day, taking 6 for 67, to carry England through to a brilliant victory by just 10 runs.Third Test, 1884-85, Sydney
With England leading the 1884-85 series 2-0, Australia needed a convincing performance in the third to claw back their chances of a series victory. They managed it, albeit in nail-biting fashion. Choosing to bat first, Australia came unstuck at the hands of Wilfred Flowers who took five wickets in their first innings, dismissing them for just 181. England fared even worse in reply, however, with Flowers top-scoring with 24. Set 214 to win, England were unlucky with the weather – a hailstorm had enlivened the pitch, and Fred “The Demon” Spofforth ran riot, taking 6 for 60, including the key wicket of Arthur Shrewsbury. With just seven runs needed for England to win, brilliance was needed – and Edwin Evans provided it with a remarkable catch at point, to dismiss England’s allrounder Flowers and win the game for Australia by six runsOnly Test, 1882, The Oval
The one that fuelled the Ashes. In the only Test of 1882, England’s infamous loss to Australia gave birth to the Ashes itself. Fred “The Demon” Spofforth’s 14 wickets cut a swathe through England’s batting in both innings. They only required 85 to win, in a low-scoring classic, but fell short by seven runs. Such was the game’s drama and intensity that one spectator died of heart failure, and another bit through his umbrella handle. We know the feeling.


Hugh Trumble’s deadly off-spin was the catalyst for Australia in their four-run victory in 1902
© The Cricketer International

Fourth Test, 1902, Manchester
A blistering 104 from Victor Trumper, and deadly bowling from Hugh Trumble were the catalysts for one of Australia’s most famous victories over England, in 1902 at Old Trafford. Trumper’s remarkable hundred came before lunch, in 115 minutes, as Australia compiled 299. They were restricted by brilliant bowling from Bill Lockwood, who was delayed from bowling due to slippery footholes, who ended with 6 for 48. England fell 37 runs short in their first innings, but another inspired spell by Lockwood, who took 5 for 28, caused Australia to collapse to 86 all out, setting England a target of 124. Steady wickets fell to both Trumble and Saunders and, with eight runs needed and the last pair at the wicket, a sudden downpour brought play to a dramatic pause. After the delay, Fred Tate poked Saunders for four. Four more for victory. Saunders bowled a faster ball, to outfox Tate’s defence, and Australia were victors by just four runs.Second Test, 2005, Edgbaston
In a match which will surely be known as “Flintoff’s Test,” once the dust settles on this year’s Ashes, England had everything to gain, and everything to lose. Their grease-lightning innings on the first day – 407 all out – was nearly matched by Australia, who fell 99 runs short. The success was short-lived, however, as Shane Warne reminded everyone of his enduring brilliance, skittling England’s top-order with six wickets. Everyone, that is, but Flintoff. His thrilling 73 was, by 50 runs, England’s highest score – and the manner in which it was attained, with muscular sixes and scythed fours, brought a partisan crowd alive. And by taking eight of Australia’s second-innings wickets, on only day three, England waltzed into their dressing-room confident and expectant of victory. Day four produced an impossibly exciting finale, as Australia’s tail-enders seized the initiative and edged ever closer to their target. With three runs still needed, Steve Harmison bounced Mike Kasprowicz, found the glove, and the much-maligned keeper, Geraint Jones, took the most important catch of his life.

The unforgiven

Twenty-four years ago 18 West Indians made history when they ventured into apartheid South Africa to play a series that went down in legend. A look back at the rebel tour of 1983

Siddhartha Vaidyanathan20-Mar-2007June 30, 2006. The first day of the final Test between India and West Indies at Sabina Park. Shortly after the tea interval Danny Germs makes his appearance in the George Headley Stand. He gesticulates wildly, craving attention. It does not take too long for the cops to banish him to a quiet corner.Talk to him and you would be convinced that the whole world has conspired to finish him off. He vividly describes the murder of his son, talking you through the whole plot, miming the bullet ripping through his temple. Three people nearby overhear and are quick to caution that none of it is true.When Jerome Taylor, a fellow Jamaican, gets a standing ovation for his five-wicket haul, Danny cannot control himself. “I could have done that,” he sobs. He begs for money at the end of the conversation and hugs you when he sees the 500-Jamaican-dollar note. He blushes when asked what he will do with the money. “A bit of booze, a bit of crack.”Richard “Danny Germs” Austin, who played two Tests and a solitary one-dayer for West Indies in the 1970s, was at one time known as the “right-handed Sobers”. Locals still talk fondly about Austin’s talent – he could open the batting, play in the middle order, bowl canny offspin and sharp medium pace and keep wicket as well. Austin last played competitive cricket in 1983. Today he is a wreck, begging on the streets of Kingston, taking refuge in cocaine. Herbert Chang played one Test for West Indies on the 1978-79 tour of India and had a distinguished first-class career. He was not allowed to play after 1983. They say he lives in Jamaica but nobody knows where. They say he lost most of his money to a woman he trusted. They say he is mentally unstable. They say he is dying.Lawrence Rowe, one of the finest batsmen to have played for West Indies, was a national hero in Jamaica … until 1983. He then decided to emigrate to Florida to become a businessman. Locals remember him being severely ostracised, hiding in the Kingston Club to watch Tests at Sabina Park, not wanting to attract the public gaze. Franklyn Stephenson is widely regarded as the greatest allrounder never to have played for West Indies. At the peak of his career, when he replaced Richard Hadlee at Nottinghamshire and managed a staggering 1,018 runs and 125 wickets in a season, he could not make the cut. Even today, despite his expertise and vast experience, nobody wants his coaching services. Why? “It’s all because of ’83. Nobody has forgotten it still.”In Station Hill, a middle-class locality of Bridgetown in Barbados, you are likely to run into David Murray, son of the great Everton Weekes. Murray, a brilliant keeper and stylish batsman, was one step away from being a part of the legendary side of the 1980s. Sadly it proved a bridge too far. Things went downhill for Murray after 1983. These days he is almost a pariah in his home town. Skeletally thin, he is often spotted on the beaches, providing foreigners with “stuff”. He refuses to speak initially but opens out freely once he has wangled $20.The common thread linking all these cricketers is the summer of 1983, when 18 West Indian ‘rebels’ undertook a path-breaking tour to South Africa. On January 15, 1983, under the shadow of Cape Town’s Devil’s Peak mountain, with a cloud of racial tension hovering, in an intensely oppressive political climate, began one of the most controversial series of all time. The 16,000 eager spectators who filled Newlands were not just watching a West Indies “rebels” side play their opening game on South African soil, they were witnessing the breaking of a barrier.Before South Africa’s sporting isolation politics had dictated that the only international cricket teams allowed to tour the country were from England, Australia and New Zealand. In late 1959 plans had been almost finalised for a West Indies team, under the captaincy of Frank Worrell, to tour. That tour was eventually scrapped because of public pressure in South Africa. But, even if it had gone ahead, Worrell’s side had been scheduled to play against non-white teams in South Africa. Here at Newlands it was much more than just Western Province v West Indians. It was White v Black, something novel to most South Africans.Within 18 overs of the one-day game the West Indians, led by Rowe, had slumped to 42 for 4. Ali Bacher, the former South Africa captain who was the architect of the tour, began to fret. The recent tour by a Sri Lankan side, who had struggled to match up to the might of the South African opposition, had seen poor crowd response and had led to heavy financial losses.


Collis King hits out on his way to 60 in the final match at Durban
© Allsport

The West Indians, though, were a far stronger outfit. In Rowe and Alvin Kallicharran they had two of the finest West Indian batsmen; in Bernard Julien, Stephenson, Collis King and Austin, four world-class allrounders; in Sylvester Clarke, Ezra Moseley and Colin Croft, a trio of devastating fast bowlers; and in Murray arguably the best wicketkeeper-batsman in the Caribbean.Enter King, the swashbuckling Bajan allrounder most famous for his dazzling 86 in the 1979 World Cup final. Tall, lithe and brilliantly athletic, he instantly captured the imagination. As David Dyer, writing in put it: “His execution is so inventive, so full of flair and so astonishingly powerful that he became a South African hero within 90 minutes of reaching the crease.” He made 101 in the Johannesburg ‘Test’ against South Africa, prompting four young (white) fans to charge on to the ground bearing a banner “Coll is King”.For a side that was initially wary of the public reaction the sense of acceptance was overwhelming. Stephenson, then a 23-year-old fast bowling allrounder for Barbados, recalls the opening game vividly. “The majority of the fans were white, the blacks were mainly cleaning the stands. When we walked out on to the field to defend 204, I remember the guys talking about having nine slips because nobody wanted to stand near the boundary. We feared we would get
objects thrown at us, maybe get beaten up. I was very tense because I had been asked to field at third man.”Then a little white kid ran on to the ground and offered me a Coke. I refused. He came back at the end of the next over and I thought, OK, let me try. I took the bottle, had a little sip and gave it back to him. You should have seen the sight at the end of the next over. There must have been about 15 kids around me, offering me drinks. It was so touching.”It was just the first of several memorable incidents on the month-long tour, one where the West Indians, with their naturally aggressive brand of cricket, were the toast of South Africa. In a milieu where a white man risked being jailed if found entertaining a black one, in cities that had distinct areas where blacks were forbidden, the West Indians were embraced. No amount of opposition seemed to matter. Hassan Howa, the leader of the South African Cricket Union, reaffirmed his policy of “no normal sport in an abnormal society” and endorsed advertisement hoardings that screamed “Don’t watch television”. But nothing could hold the sky-rocketing interest in check. The third one-dayer attracted what is thought to be the biggest crowd ever to watch a cricket match at Berea Park in Pretoria, widely regarded as the heartland of apartheid. It was an astonishing sight. Bacher, unable to control his tears, stated emphatically: “If you’ve won over Pretoria, you’ve made it.”Murray remembers the reception during a visit to Soweto, the country’s largest black urban complex: “The kids had never imagined they would meet any cricketers. Seeing us and being coached by us, they were completely ecstatic.”Croft had to endure the ignominy of being ejected from a whites-only carriage on a train but even he ended the tour “so impressed it ain’t funny”. One of Stephenson’s experiences in particular was indicative of the social change that the cricketers were instigating. “In Port Elizabeth a tall, white guy, also named Stephenson, took me to a [whites-only] supermarket and a lot of heads turned. I got to the counter and the lady asked me to sign something. At that moment everybody stopped their work and rushed towards me for an autograph. To actually walk into a white supermarket and stop business was quite something.”Dyer encapsulated the South African mood: “One thing is certain: the interest which the tour generated is immeasurable. Take a drive past any school and you’ll see children not playing their traditional game, soccer, but cricket – taking turns to be Collis, Sylvester or Franklyn.”


Emmerson Trotman batting in the tour opener at Cape Town
© Allsport

Cult status in South Africa was in stark contrast to the outrage back home. The 18 West Indians had not just undertaken a tour but defied their governments, the United Nations and the cricket authorities to enter the forbidden land of apartheid. There were ominous precedents in this regard. In 1970 the Guyana government had declared that Garfield Sobers, then West Indies’ captain, would not be allowed into the country unless he apologised for a visit to Rhodesia on which he had been photographed having lunch with Prime Minister Ian Smith. In 1974 an international team sponsored by the British financier Derrick Robins were not allowed to include Guyana and Trinidad & Tobago on their itinerary because Robins had also sponsored a similar team to South Africa. In 1981 the Georgetown Test was aborted because England picked Robin Jackman, who had played as a professional in Rhodesia and South Africa.Now a West Indies team were actually playing in South Africa. It would no doubt serve as a PR coup, indicating that the country had indeed broken down the barriers of apartheid, even though the system legally enforced was to the disadvantage of the black majority. The players were doomed once they went against the various governments that strongly supported the anti-apartheid movement.Michael Manley, the Prime Minister of Jamaica, echoed the sentiment in his famous A History of West Indian Cricket: “To the members of the black diaspora the oppression which continues unabated in South Africa has become the symbol of more than a tyranny to be overthrown. Apartheid points like a dagger at the throat of black self worth in every corner occupied by the descendants of Africa.”On January 6, 1983 Allan Rae, president of the West Indies Cricket Board, publicly praised Rowe and Croft for turning down an offer to go to South Africa. Five days later Rowe and his band furtively flew out to Miami, using a British West Indies Airways flight as a decoy and boarding an American Airlines flight three hours earlier. As they exited the Jan Smuts International Airport in Johannesburg a crowd of about 100 clapped and cheered. In one corner three black men held up a poster: “Freedom First – Cricket Later”.On January 12 an editorial in the Barbados Daily Nation lashed out at the rebels. “Perhaps, as they make their long journey to Johannesburg, the players can reflect on the fact that, had they been born in Soweto and not St Peter, Cape Town and not Spanish Town, their sporting talent would never have seen the light of day,” it said. (Incidentally the Nation was the only paper that did not boycott the tour; it even sent a journalist, Al Gilkes, to cover the games.)Joining the large section of critics were the West Indian captain, Clive Lloyd – “I know that some of them are out of work and the money is very tempting but that is not all in life” – and fast bowler Michael Holding. Money, no doubt, was the clinching factor. It was reported that the Test cricketers who went on the rebel tour would be paid $120,000 (£60,000) for two seasons while the others would get $100,000. Finding a place in the all-conquering West Indies side of the time required almost superhuman ability and, unlike first-class cricketers in England, those on the fringes were financially crippled.Writing in the Nation soon after the tour began, Tony Cozier unravelled the link between the seven Bajan cricketers who undertook the journey, articulating their monetary positions. None had worked in Barbados during the off-season for some years preceding the tour. Clarke, who had three daughters to support, was a carpenter by trade but had not worked as one since he began his cricket career in 1978. Moseley had been a waiter at a south coast hotel before he signed a contract to play in one of the English leagues. King’s father was a foreman at a sugar factory. Emerson Trotman occasionally worked in a car rental firm but had no permanent job in Barbados. And Alvin Greenidge had no professional employment since he began playing overseas. In fact, one of the rebels, Albert Padmore, in a letter to the Barbados Cricket Association on behalf of the island’s players, spelt out that economic considerations were the chief reason.E Lawson Bayley, a columnist for the Sun Herald, was one of the few who empathised with the players: “Something is seriously wrong when men who live in glass houses, drive air-conditioned Mercedes, eat lunch at a hotel every day, vacation in Paris and keep two wives can tell a poor man that he must emotionally turn away money in a society that makes money its god.”At the end of the tour the West Indians, who won the “Test” series 2-1 and the one-dayers 4-2, successfully negotiated a 15% bonus. Every game of the tour was a sell-out and South Africa also gained revenue through the sale of souvenirs and tokens. Gilkes delivered his verdict in the Sunday Sun: “Rowe and his rebel team had become not the mercenaries they were being labeled outside South Africa but 18 black missionaries converting and
baptising thousands and thousands of whites into a religion of black acceptance and respect from Cape Town to Johannesburg, to Durban and right into the throne room of Afrikanerdom itself, Pretoria.”


The tour squad
© Allsport

Heroes in one part of the world, they were outcasts in another. Unlike their English counterparts, who were banned for three years, the West Indians received life bans in all forms of the game. It was only in 1989 that the Commonwealth heads decided to wipe out the past and the bans were revoked. The only one of the rebels who got a chance to play for West Indies was Moseley, who was well past his prime when he made his international debut at the age of 32.Nine members of the side of 1983 currently reside outside their home countries. Rowe remains a legend but will be forever remembered with, in Manley’s words, “a flaw at the centre of his character”. Everton Mattis, Rowe’s stylish Jamaican team-mate who, according to observers, came extremely close to national selection, and Ray Wynter, the promising Jamaican fast bowler, also shifted base to the United States.Kallicharran and King settled in England, where they continue to play league cricket. Croft, one of the most destructive bowlers to have come out of the Caribbean, moved out of Guyana and settled in Trinidad. Julien, an integral member of the World Cup-winning side in 1975, had to endure the humiliation of being treated as an outcast in his native Trinidad and struggled to find a job. It was only much later that he found acceptance.Greenidge, Moseley and Stephenson decided to stay on in Barbados and currently coach youngsters. Stephenson was ignored by the West Indies selectors even after the ban was lifted, though he turned in some fine performances in the County Championship. The high point of his career came in 1991 when he chose to play for Orange Free State in the heart of the Boer country, a one-time Afrikaner bastion; he went on to inspire them to seven title triumphs. Murray and the two Jamaicans who stayed back, Chang and Austin, were reduced to wrecks. Clarke, whose international career was limited to 11 Tests, spent nine productive seasons at Surrey and was as clinically fearsome as any of his West Indian colleagues of the time. At the end of his professional career he came home to Barbados, played some club cricket and took up carpentry again. He collapsed and died at his home in 1999.Twenty four years ago 18 men left their country as villains and became heroes in another. With hindsight it can now be said they were neither.

Enter the tadpole

West Indies’ new spin hope in focus

Kanishkaa Balachandran01-Jun-2006

The Spin Doctor from Princes Town – Dave Mohammed proved his worth with a profitable season for Trinidad and Tobago © Trinidad & Tobago Express
Watching Dave Mohammed go one-up against the Indians in the fifth ODI at Trinidad must have been especially pleasing for the locals and old-timers who lived through the era of Lance Gibbs and Sonny Ramadhin, better known as the halcyon days of West Indian spin bowling. But then 20 years ago, Clive Lloyd decided that he had had enough – ironically against India – and brought in the transition from spin to raw pace. In the years that followed, the rebirth of spin was reduced to a mere apparition.Spinners have only had brief moments in the sun since, with the likes of Roger Harper, Mahendra Nagamootoo, Neil McGarrell and Omari Banks, to name a few. But rising through the ranks all the while was a young left-armer from south Trinidad, nicknamed Tadpole by his team-mates, pegging away on the slow pitches in the domestic competitions.A bagful of wickets in the 2005-06 Carib Beer Cup was enough to convince Brian Lara to throw the ball to Mohammed – not at the eleventh hour – but in the eleventh over of India’s chase. The gamble started paying off when Mohammed kept beating the bat with almost fidgety regularity, disguising his googlies intelligently. Reputations against spin took a beating when Yuvraj Singh was squared up by another Mohammed special. His prowess as a fielder too has been well documented over the years, justified by his crucial one-handed fling at the stumps to send Rahul Dravid packing.The youngest of ten siblings, Mohammed endured a lot of hardship in his early years, hailing from a humble background. Cricket was his saviour, and his first crack at first-class cricket in 2001 was a sensational one. He sent the commentators into raptures with four wickets in his first 16 balls, rattling a bemused West Indies B lineup. A crucial 42 batting at No.4 and another four-wicket haul was enough to shut the opposition out of the match, and he deservedly bagged the Player-of-the-Match Award.Two games later, he got a feel of the West Indies dressing room atmosphere, fast-tracked into the squad for the third Test against the touring South Africans though he missed out on the final eleven. Two years later against the same opposition, an injury to Jerome Taylor paved the way for his Test debut at Cape Town. Lara sought out Mohammed midway through the tour to exploit South Africa’s weaknesses against spin, but his success at the domestic level didn’t translate into international success instantly.Back in the wilderness with Trinidad and Tobago, Mohammed announced his second coming with a roaring season in the 2005-06 Carib Beer Cup, and was instrumental in helping a resurgent T&T clinch the title. His selection for the one-dayers against Zimbabwe was expected and he used his strengths to good effect on debut, taking three wickets. However, the local media was still circumspect about his chances of succeeding against superior teams like India, but that spell at Trinidad was no fluke.With West Indies in search of a world-class spinner, a pre-requisite for every side, they can take the example of Daniel Vettori and nurture Mohammed as their next hope.TimelineFebruary 2001
First-class debut – Trinidad and Tobago v West Indies B in the Busta CupMarch 2001
Plays for West Indies Board President’s XI vs South AfricansAugust 2001
Tours Kenya with West Indies. Plays in both warm-up matchesOctober 2001
List A debut – vs Rest of Leeward Islands in the Red Stripe BowlJanuary 2004
Test debut -vs South Africa at Cape Town. Takes 3 for 112July 2004
Tours England with West Indies. Selected for the Old Trafford TestJanuary – March 2005
Takes 25 wickets from eight matches in the Carib Beer CupJune – July 2005
Tours Sri Lanka with West Indies A side. Emerges highest wicket-taker in the five limited-overs games with 11 wickets.May 2006
ODI debut -vs Zimbabwe at St Lucia. Takes 3 for 37. At Trinidadagainst India, he dismisses Yuvraj Singh and Rahul Dravid as West Indies romp home to a 4-1 series win.Vital Stat
Mohammed finished as the highest wicket-taker in the 2005-06 Carib Beer Cup with 45 wickets from seven games. This included four five-wicket hauls and a ten-wicket haul. His best effort was the 7 for 48 which sealed T&T a berth in the finals.What he says
“Since I came in to the Trinidad and Tobago side, I have been playing tough. I just take it on myself to play normal and be confident all the time. The run-up was long and I knew I had to change a few things to make it to a higher grade.”What you may not know
Mohammed is the first player from Princes Town in south Trinidad to play for West Indies. Another former resident, Robin Singh, could have done so but he decided to represent another country – India.

Diamonds and rust

India had an eventful, often turbulent year, marked by all kinds of leadership-related turmoil, but it was a surprisingly successful one as well

Siddhartha Vaidyanathan07-Jan-2008

India won their first big international title in over two decades, the World Twenty20, in 2007 © Getty Images
Crash out of one world event, storm to victory in another; fumble over the appointment of a coach, win a rare Test series in England; get flustered after one player resigns from captaincy and another refuses the job, revel in the newly appointed captain, dominating Pakistan in the process; panic after an informal league lures domestic players, watch the closest Ranji Trophy league round in recent memory.Rarely did a day go by in 2007 without Indian cricket throwing up something or the other. If it was an unnamed member of the team management leaking news at the start of the year, an unnamed selector was doing the same by the end of it. If none of the board officials made the headlines, there was always Sreesanth.Scratch the turbulent surface, though, and you have one of India’s most successful years. The year began with them squandering a series-winning opportunity in Cape Town and ended with a thrashing in Melbourne, but India made up with a couple of series wins against England and Pakistan in between – one after 21 years, the other after 27. Throw in a win in the World Twenty20 and you had a year to look back on fondly.If India rose steadily in Tests, in limited-overs cricket they oscillated from the pathetic to the inspirational. If they could do nothing right against Bangladesh in the World Cup opener, they were unstoppable against Australia in the World Twenty20 semi-final. When India won an ODI, it was usually owing to Sachin Tendulkar. Whether it was his 76-ball 100 in Vadodara that sealed the series against West Indies, or the twin 90s against South Africa in Belfast, or his magical 94 that helped level the series at The Oval, or even his uplifting 97 against Pakistan in Gwalior, he was the guiding force. His only weakness? Falling in the nineties.He was far quieter in the Test arena, preferring the path of least risk. Eclipsing him were two contrasting batsmen: the languid Wasim Jaffer and the enigmatic Sourav Ganguly. Jaffer’s efficient run-scoring underlined his coming of age as a batsman over the last couple of years, but it was Ganguly who made for the poignant story. Banished into exile a little over a year ago, he returned to conquer, batting better than he had ever done before. A number of moments stand out but his towering double-hundred in Bangalore will be talked about the longest.India went through much of the year without a coach. Greg Chappell resigned after the World Cup debacle and the board didn’t think it was urgent to appoint someone on a long-term basis. Ravi Shastri, Chandu Borde and Lalchand Rajput handled the responsibilities over different series before Gary Kirsten was finally handed a two-year contract.Captains changed too. Rahul Dravid relinquished the job after the England series and the selectors gave Mahendra Singh Dhoni the responsibility in the shorter formats. Anil Kumble was handed the reins for the longer version, though the appointment was likely to last only a couple of series at the most. Banished into exile a little over a year ago, Ganguly returned to conquer, batting better than he had ever done before. A number of moments stand out but his towering double-hundred in Bangalore will be talked about the longest High point
The final of the World Twenty20 against Pakistan will top the list. India’s first victory on the world stage for 22 years was engineered by a bunch of rookies who started without much of a chance. Dhoni was leading a group of unknowns, but they turned in one fearless performance after another to strike gold. The Test series win in England must come a close second.Low point
The first-round exit from the World Cup. India were outclassed by Bangladesh and Sri Lanka and never looked good enough to mix it with the best. A bunch of ageing stars dawdled in the field, and a helpless captain and garrulous coach bungled at the top.Several shenanigans of the board will vie for a close second.New kids on the block
A number of promising stars were part of the World Twenty20 squad. Rohit Sharma and Robin Uthappa shone bright but it was probably RP Singh who emerged the strongest, going from a second-change bowler to a new-ball exponent. He was probably India’s most consistent bowler in England, and began the New Year leading the attack.What does 2008 hold?
There’s no doubt that a number of voids will open up. With Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman, Tendulkar, and Kumble nearing the end of their careers, India could be in for a serious depletion. The challenge would be to phase these players out gradually, blooding new talent at the right time and making sure the boat isn’t rocked too hard. It may turn out to be the most challenging task yet.

The difference was in the batting

Tamil Nadu’s relatively inexperienced line-up was out-thought by Mumbai’s bowlers and out-batted by their batsmen

Kanishkaa Balachandran in Chennai17-Nov-2007


Tamil Nadu’s batsmen could have learnt from Abhishek Nayar’s counter-attacking 105 on Friday
© Cricinfo Ltd

The result, an eight-wicket win, was predictable. Mumbai, the defending champions, were searching for their opening victory of the season; a young Tamil Nadu side was trying to establish an identity for themselves after an exodus of senior players. It wasn’t much of a contest: Mumbai spotted a weakness – the batting – within the first session and chipped away at that, inducing mistakes rather than walking away with gimmes.It was a good toss to win for captain S Badrinath but, as he and the coach, WV Raman, later admitted, the game was all but lost after the first hour. The first ball after the first drinks break saw a wicket fall and two more followed in quick succession. One of those was Badrinath, the team’s most consistent batsman and one on the fringes of national selection, who chopped one onto his stumps without opening his account.Despite chanceless half centuries from Dinesh Karthik and R Srinivasan, Tamil Nadu were shot out for 206 before stumps on day one. It’s easy to blame devils – real or otherwise – in the pitch and it was two-paced but, refreshingly, Badrinath and Raman didn’t go down that road. “We simply didn’t take advantage of the toss,” Raman told Cricinfo after the match. “It was the same pitch for both sides. Mumbai just made fewer mistakes.”What, then, caused Tamil Nadu to fold up for 206 and 214? One observation was that the batsmen at times failed to cover the line of the ball quickly enough, not knowing when the ball would suddenly shoot low. When sound technique was needed, Mumbai’s batsmen rose to the task on more occasions, covering the line and defending off the meat of the bat, the sound of leather hitting willow reverberating across the ground. Even defensive strokes were met with cheers and claps from the players’ tent, and it clearly wasn’t meant for fun.Of the 20 Tamil Nadu wickets that fell, seven were out bowled, and five of those were in the second innings, with the side under pressure to wipe out the deficit and build a substantial lead. Ajit Agarkar got one to sneak between bat and pad on the second ball of the third morning, and Aavishkar Salvi hit the timber in all his three dismissals in the second innings. Badrinath dragged one onto his stumps playing away from his body, R Srinivasan didn’t get his foot across to cover the inswing while K Vasudevadas paid the price for not knowing where his off stump was. Mumbai, by contrast, lost just two wickets in the same manner.The chief wrecker in both innings was Powar with match figures of 9 for 123 and it was clear the home team’s batsmen had problems tackling his slow and canny offspinners. Too rarely did the batsmen get adventurous and use their feet against him. Srinivasan survived a few nervy moments and close shouts for leg-before, attempting back-foot strokes. They could have followed the example of the young R Ashwin, whose willingness to get a good stride forward helped counter Powar’s spin. Abhishek Nayar’s aggressive 105 was the best example of how to counter-attack the conditions. His unusually wide stance helped him get to the pitch of the ball and cart it over the infield.Perhaps it’s hard to expect too much out of a young side, with a few pushed into the big league earlier than expected. Raman spoke of the happy dressing-room atmosphere and a few younger players, in turn, spoke about his positive influence. As Raman put it, with a young side, the only way, is up.

Mendis factor works in Murali's favour

How India’s ‘Fab Four’ handled spin was always going to be a central focus of this match, and of the series

Jamie Alter in Colombo25-Jul-2008

Ajantha Mendis’ arrival means Mahela Jayawardene has not one but two spinners who can bamboozle the opposition
© AFP

How India’s ‘Fab Four’ handled spin was always going to be a central focus of this match, and of the series. The assumption was that Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and VVS Laxman would prove a sterner test for Ajantha Mendis and Muttiah Muralitharan than the likes of Suresh Raina, Yuvraj Singh and Robin Uthappa, whom Mendis outsmarted in the Asia Cup. What unfolded at the SSC was a poor batting display, put into motion by Virender Sehwag’s ungainly dismissal and culminating in Dinesh Karthik’s ill-advised slog-sweep back into Muralitharan’s hands.While he got only one wicket, Mendis, on debut, provided plenty of worries to the Fab Four. He took away the batsmen’s focus from Muralitharan, who then laughed all the way home. Mendis was entrusted with the ball after ten overs and a few full tosses were duly put away by Gautam Gambhir. With the last ball before tea, he beat Dravid with a legbreak, but it wasn’t enough for his first Test wicket. After the break, Mendis, like Monty Panesar before him, had an Indian legend as his first Test victim. It came with the flick of the finger, the carrom ball. Dravid was beaten clean and square by a ball which landed on middle stump and hurried past an uncertain back-foot prod, disturbing the off stump. Mahela Jayawardene was the first to run to Mendis, embracing him in a bear hug and beaming ever so proudly. The look on Dravid’s face said it all.When asked if the hype surrounding Mendis going into the Test was justified, Jayawardene had put it back to the media, saying it came from them. Is it too early to usher him into Test cricket, was the question on the eve of this Test. On the evidence of his performance today, and more so the way he withdrew the focus from Murali, the answer is a firm no. Today provided a mere glimpse of where Sri Lankan spin is heading.India’s capitulation to 159 for 6 continued the larger theme of their best displays being outside the subcontinent. Batting could never have been easier than on this dodo-eyed track but the introduction of two unconventional spinners – one the highest Test wicket-taker and the other on debut – changed the equation.Murali’s first strike was classical sucker-punch stuff, Gambhir forced into chipping a leading edge to short cover. Murali burst to life to celebrate his 150th wicket at the SSC and soon trained his attention towards the new batsman. Tendulkar was 172 short of Brian Lara’s record 11,953 runs in Tests, but that was immaterial.A riveting battle began between the two spinners and Tendulkar, offering fans a treat. It was a battle of wits mostly between Murali and Tendulkar. Concentration writ across his brow, his feet moving back to Murali, and forward to Mendis’ wrist-spin from around the stumps, Tendulkar’s device was attack.

Muttiah Muralitharan cashed in as the batsmen tried to figure out Ajantha Mendis
© AFP

He was beaten on the seventh delivery he faced from Mendis, attempting to flick the ball across the line but only getting a leading edge to the off side. He was firm on attacking, using his feet to caress Murali through mid-on and slog-sweeping Mendis from off stump to deep midwicket. From then on Tendulkar mostly opted to play Murali by going back. So far back, in fact, that he was almost onto his stumps. Alas, the contest was over before it could truly blossom. Murali slipped in a doosra from around the stumps, it turned across from middle and leg, and Tendulkar’s uncertainty resulted in an inside edge onto the stumps. A contest that had promised a lot more ended abrubtly.Blood scented, Murali bustled in, round-arm, wide-eyed, and bowled delivery after delivery of testing spin. Wilting under the pressure, Ganguly and Karthik played panic shots. Ironic, for perhaps they were so puzzled by Mendis that they took chances against Murali. Ganguly puttered along to 23 before a needless attempt at a sweep was gobbled up. With VVS Laxman showing laudable application, all Karthik had to do was see out the ten-odd overs till stumps. Instead his comeback innings was over before it began, a silly swipe going nowhere but into Murali’s hands.Sri Lanka’s spinners were far more successful than India’s on a track that allowed Sri Lanka to post 600. And the pressure told. To look back at the last time India were under immense pressure from spin, you would have to pick out Murali’s one-man show in Delhi or in Bangalore a few months before that when the unlikely duo of Arshad Khan and Shahid Afridi spun Pakistan to a famous win.Gary Kirsten, India’s coach, blamed India’s predicament on poor batting, and three of India’s shots were indeed damning. The first-day rain, the four Sri Lankan hundreds, the umpiring review, all faded into the background as Murali and Mendis spun a web around India. The series has sparked into life.

Laying claim to the room at the top

An exciting new left-hander of Indian origin may just be the answer to South Africa’s opener crisis

Azad Essa18-Mar-2009Imraan Khan and Hashim Amla were the non-white blue-eyed boys of Durban High School, among South Africa’s premier cricketing institutions, from where the likes of Barry Richards, Richard Snell and Lance Klusener graduated. Together the two tormented bowlers from across the region and later the country.Imraan, a prolific, elegant left-hand batsman, appeared years ahead with his ability to spend hours at the crease, both caressing and bludgeoning his way to hundred after hundred each weekend. The little skinny lad was a quiet riot with bat in hand, and when he decided to turn his arm over one morning, bowling biting offspinners, with ball as well. He would often score a hundred and fetch up to five wickets per game.Immy, as he is affectionately known, is as elegantly murderous on the front foot today as he was as a young lad of 15; a sweet timer of the ball and prolific through the off side, drives and cuts are his weapons of choice. Like Amla, he is blessed with strong wrists that allow him to whip almost any delivery pitched up on the stumps through midwicket with impunity. His occasional tentativeness against short balls is offset by an ability to move inside the line and turn them gently round the corner. In many ways, Imraan’s leg-side prowess is the mirror image of Amla’s; only, his friends say, more stylish.Both boys waltzed through all levels of state cricket, breaking records and announcing themselves as the very future of South African cricket. So talented were these two, even transformation didn’t seem such a daunting prospect after all.Amla joined the KZN Dolphins by the time he completed high school, and thrived in the middle order there. He was soon appointed state captain and then given a fairytale entry into Test cricket in 2004, when he was selected as the first South African of Indian origin to represent the country in a Test match, against, aptly or ironically, India in the bullring of Eden Gardens.Where Amla’s run in first-class cricket was compelling, Imraan’s graduation from the elite youth teams to state level was anything but charming in comparison. As a youngster he had demonstrated immense powers of concentration to regularly bat for long periods of time, but at first-class level it seemed as if he had abandoned his formula and had geared up to merely dominate bowlers, striving for immediate success.Following Amla’s lead proved a little difficult. Since he made his first-class debut for the Dolphins in 2003-04 as an offspinner who could bat, Imraan’s success has been little more than a line of jagged stop-starts marked by unfulfilled promises.The lofted drive was almost always taken at mid-off, the buoyant push to the testing outswinger almost always went to second slip, and a few tight spells of bowling would invariably induce Imraan to self-destruct, wafting at a marginally wide one.While he tasted relative success in the four-day competition – averaging in the mid-thirties for most of the past five seasons – his enthusiasm to dominate often resulted in him looking out of his depth as a reliable opener. Worse still, his once much-lauded offspin, a plus for any South African cricketer, became an abandoned project.But it all changed in 2008.

Like Amla, Imraan is blessed with strong wrists that allow him to whip almost any delivery pitched up on the stumps through midwicket with impunity. His occasional tentativeness against short balls is offset by an ability to move inside the line and turn them gently round the corner

After being selected for the South African Emerging Players tour of Australia, where he top-scored, Imraan turned on the mettle.The 2008-09 first-class season has seen a more patient cricketer, more in touch with his ability and more willing to play within himself. Imraan is among the leading scorers this domestic season, with over 800 runs, an average of above 60, and a tally of five centuries for the season – just one short of the South African record, currently held by Barry Richards, Mike Procter and Peter Kirsten.Imraan says it was just a case of a few technical adjustments. “There is probably a lot more discipline in my game. I used to get a lot of starts and then throw it away, but I am trying really hard to not make those mistakes once I get in.”The Dolphins manager of playing affairs, Jay Naidoo, agrees that the new Imraan is a more mature, focused player: “I think he is older and understands his game better. At Supersport level he has done well previously, but he had this tendency of scoring of seventies and eighties and then getting out. This season it has been his ability to turn those numbers into three figures.”A batting average in the mid-thirties is a basic minimum for wicketkeepers today, not for openers. With South Africa in the midst of an opening-batsman crisis, Imraan knows that this surge in batting form couldn’t have come at a more opportune time. “There was no other opportunity, and it just so happens I’ve been scoring runs. Now is probably the right time,” he says.The Cape Cobras’ Andrew Puttick was an obvious alternative, with a far better career record, but Puttick’s form in the Supersport series this season has been patchy in comparison. The sheer weight of Imraan’s runs these last few months muscles him right to the top of the reckoning. The question remains: is one fantastic season reason enough to select a batsman?”The only thing a player can do is to make runs. And if the opportunities arise, like in this case, where the top order has been struggling, then if you take all the opening bats in the country, he has been in the top bracket,” argues Naidoo.What matters now is that this little Chanderpaul-like figure of a man, having made the runs and earned his call-up, can turn on the magic and grab hold of his destiny rather than seek to chase it. If he does, he stands a genuine chance of becoming Graeme Smith’s long-term partner.Imraan’s unorthodox opening style and yet elegant penchant to bludgeon the ball are exciting, fresh and worth a shot. Now it is up to him to decide how much he wants this chance.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus