Moeen abuse shows cricket's dark side

The booing of Moeen Ali at Edgbaston revealed the ugly side of sporting rivalry and suggested intolerance remains in the UK. It should not be ignored

George Dobell at Edgbaston07-Sep-2014It should have been the perfect end to an absorbing summer of international cricket. We had beautiful weather. We had a sell-out crowd. We had a run-soaked T20 that contained outrageous skills and an exciting finish.We should have gone home talking about MS Dhoni’s decision to turn down singles in the final over. His self-confidence and his preparedness to take responsibility for the team. Or, perhaps, his lack of confidence in his team-mates.We should have gone home talking about Virat Kohli’s only half-century of the tour in international cricket – the same number as James Anderson – or Eoin Morgan’s brilliant innings. The England captain, so short of runs in international cricket this summer, helped England thrash 81 from the final five overs of their innings and scored 56 in the 15 balls before his dismissal. We might even have witnessed the birth of a new-look England side for both forms of the limited-overs game.Either way, this should have been a brilliant advert for cricket. But instead there was a sour end to the summer. An unsettling end. An end that suggested, for all the progress we think we have made in creating a multicultural society in the UK, we have a long way to go.Moeen Ali’s contributions were not universally appreciated at Edgbaston, the ground where he began his career•AFPBecause, in the middle of Birmingham on a bright afternoon in 2014, we saw at least one player subjected to abuse from a far from insubstantial section of the crowd on the basis of either his religion or his national or ethnic origin.Moeen Ali was booed when he came out to bat. He was booed when he came on to bowl. He was booed most times he touched the ball. And he was booed either because he is a player of Asian origin playing for England – Ravi Bopara also attracted some boos, though far fewer – because he is Muslim or, perhaps most pertinently, because he is of Pakistani origin and the vast majority of the crowd were India supporters.On the back of every ticket and inside every match programme it states: “Spectators shall not engage in any conduct, act towards or speak to any player, umpire, referee or other official or other spectators in a manner which offends, insults, humiliates, intimidates, threatens, disparages or vilifies that other person on the basis of that other person’s race, religion, colour, national or ethnic origin.”By such a definition, it is impossible to justify these boos. It is inappropriate to dismiss them as “banter” – an invidious description used to excuse sexism, homophobia, bullying and racism in many walks of life – and it is inappropriate to dismiss them as a symptom of any rivalry that exists between Pakistan and India.Nor should we link this with the booing experienced by Stuart Broad in Australia and James Anderson and Ravi Jadeja this summer. Those jeers, unappealing though they were, do not stem from a dislike of origin or religion. They reflected specific issues.Nor should we fool ourselves that these are pantomime boos. Just as the monkey chants that used to shame football grounds in the UK were unacceptable, so it must be unacceptable to hear a player derided for their religion or origin. It is not funny.And let us not mistake this issue with any pretence that this is simply a manifestation of support for India. Spectators are free to support whichever side they like and the passion for cricket from spectators of Asian origin in the UK is of huge benefit to the game. But there is a chasm between supporting one side and denigrating the players of the opposition. It would be irresponsible to link the two.What, it might be asked, would be the reaction if an all-white crowd booed a player of Asian origin? What would be the implications if a black player was booed each time he touched the ball? If such behaviours are deemed unacceptable – and, thankfully, in this day and age, they are – why should the booing of a man on the basis of his religion or origin be any different?Moeen was born in Birmingham and he graduated through Warwickshire’s youth system. He has a mixed-heritage family with a white grandmother from the Birmingham area. His religion or ethnicity should not be issues and he has previously said that such behaviour does not affect him.But there is an irony that Moeen has spoken of being a role model. He has spoken of showing that it is possible to be British, Muslim and proud of both. He has spoken of encouraging other Asian cricketers into mainstream league and club cricket in the UK. He has, despite his relative youth and inexperience, spoken only of inclusivity and unity. He makes an unlikely villain.The episode proved difficult for the ground authorities to handle. Had the stewards started to eject those involved, the situation could have deteriorated. Had Morgan, who denied any knowledge of the booing, led his team from the pitch, the situation could have deteriorated.But just because a situation is difficult, it does not mean it should be avoided. This sort of episode should not happen. It must not happen. And if we find it unacceptable – and we really should – we must not ignore it. Whatever the many mistakes of the past, 21st century Britain cannot be accepting of intolerance based around race, religion, colour, national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation or any other such issue.Cricket can unite. In Afghanistan and the Caribbean and LA and Ireland, it has been shown to bring people from differing backgrounds together. It does it in league teams around the country every week. Here it provided a peek behind the façade of multicultural Britain. It was an ugly, depressing sight. And it should not be ignored.

Seamers give England edge, toss vital

Stats indicate that England’s fast bowlers have used the conditions at Lord’s better in recent times, and that teams batting first are at an advantage

Shiva Jayaraman15-Jul-2014Not since 1992-93 have England gone nine consecutive Tests without a win. They went winless in ten matches in that one-year period and are close to matching that streak, having not won any of the nine they played since their win in the Ashes, in Chester-le-street last year. However, if there was one venue where England would like to play to end this run, it would be Lord’s. Like most venues in England in recent times, Lord’s has produced results more often than not. Of the 12 Tests played there since 2009, ten have had results.What will comfort England is that they have won eight of the 11 Tests at Lord’s since 2009. The only defeat was against South Africa in 2012. Other than South Africa, Sri Lanka are the only team who have managed, to some extent, to hold their own against the hosts at Lord’s in recent times, drawing both their Tests, including the remarkable one last month.England’s record against India at this venue is good too – 11 wins in 16 Tests. India have lost more Tests at Lord’s than at any other venue – the most matches a team has lost at an overseas venue (outside the Ashes). The only time India won here was in 1986. Since then, England have won three out of five Tests.England’s fast bowlers have had a major role to play in their team’s success at Lord’s. In the last five years, James Anderson – who needs only two wickets to pass Ian Botham and become the highest wicket-taker at Lord’s – and Stuart Broad have shared 93 wickets between them at this venue at an average of 24.29 and a strike rate of 52.2. However, a decisive factor in England’s recent success at Lord’s is that the visiting fast bowlers have not been able to match their English counterparts. While England’s seamers have taken 163 wickets at an average of 25.92 since 2009, the opposition seamers have conceded 11 runs more apiece for their 129 wickets.

Fast bowlers at Lord’s since 2009

TeamMatWktsAveSREco5/10wEngland1116325.9251.82.997/1Opposition1112936.9363.33.497/1Fast bowlers have done better than spinners at Lord’s. Given the helpful conditions, fast bowlers have bowled more and have had greater impact on the matches: in 12 Tests since 2009, they have taken 15 five-fors and two ten-wicket hauls. Spinners have managed only three five-fors. Wickets by seamers have also come cheaper by almost seven runs apiece.

Pace v spin at Lord’s since 2009

Bowling typeMatWktsAveSREco5/10wPace12*31830.4656.23.2515/2Spin12*9137.3970.73.173/0* Australia played Pakistan in a neutral Test at Lord’s in 2010From India’s perspective, the best time for their spinners to bowl at the England batsmen would be the final session on the third day and the first two sessions of the fourth day. This is when when spinners have been most effective at Lord’s in recent times. Of the 91 wickets taken by spinners since 2009, 41 have come in these three sessions. Spinners have averaged 22.10 during these sessions and have had to bowl around 41 balls for each wicket. In the rest of the match, they have averaged 52.55 and have a strike rate of 94.6.

Best sessions for spin at Lord’s, since 2009

SessionsMatWktsAveSREcoDay 3 – session 3, Day 4 – session 1 & 2124022.1040.73.26Other sessions125152.5594.63.33Given the conditions, England batsmen have not had much trouble against spinners either, and have done much better than their opposition at this venue. In 11 Tests since 2009, England batsmen averaged 39.17 at Lord’s, while other batsmen averaged almost 15 runs fewer. Visiting batsmen have only seven hundreds in these 11 Tests, half the number of hundreds England managed during the same time.Ian Bell and Joe Root have done remarkably well at this venue. Bell has 1205 runs at an average of 57.38 and his last four innings here have produced one hundred and two fifties. Root has scored 512 runs from six innings at an average of 102.40 and two of his last three scores at Lord’s are 180 against Australia last summer, and an unbeaten 200 against Sri Lanka last month. Alastair Cook, though, remains a worry for England, given his recent slump in form and also because Lord’s hasn’t been kind to Cook for some time now. Since the India Test in 2011, Cook has scored 246 runs at this ground at an average of 20.50, with only one fifty-plus score in 12 innings.

Batsmen at Lord’s, since 2009

TeamMatRunsHSAveSR100/50sEngland116582
22639.17
56.214/32
Opposition11524619324.7447.77/26

England batsmen at Lord’s

BatsmanInnsRunsHSAve100/50sAlastair Cook301206
10641.58
3/7
Ian Bell26120519957.384/8Matt Prior22871126*45.843/4Stuart Broad1864816943.201/3Joe Root6512200*102.402/1England batsmen may have also benefited from batting first regularly on a pitch that is at its best on the first day of the Test. Since 2009, batsmen have averaged 42.49 on the first day at Lord’s, a fraction over 14 runs more than the average for the other four days. Batsmen average the worst on the fourth day of the Test, scoring just over 26 for every wicket. Of the eight Tests England have won here in the last five years, they batted first in seven. They batted second in the only Test they lost – to South Africa. In the last ten Tests with a result at Lord’s, nine have been won by teams batting first.

Day-wise batting stats at Lord’s, since 2009

Day of playRunsDismissalsAveSRDay 128476742.4950.8
Day 2327211029.7555.1Day 327699628.8450.3Day 425599826.1152.8Day 526354927.5751.3

Time for Unmukt Chand to deliver

Unmukt Chand has been given a long rope by the selectors, but the runs are not coming and his temperament has also come under scrutiny; he must repay the faith shown in him soon, before his chances finally run out

Amit Shetty12-Dec-2014Four years ago, Unmukt Chand was in 11th grade in a Delhi school when he showed maturity beyond his years in tackling the seasoned Sanjay Bangar and JP Yadav on a seaming Roshanara track. Although Bangar and Yadav were no Stuart Broad or James Anderson, being veterans of first-class cricket, they knew how to pick up wickets. But Chand still managed a score of 151 in a team total of 295, not bad at all give the ball was also swinging.With that innings, Chand had marked himself as one of the talented young batsmen. There was a flow to his batting that made him exciting to watch. Then the 2012 Under-19 World Cup happened, and Chand, who led India to victory, became the next big thing in Indian cricket.But four years later, there are fears as to whether Chand, now 21, is stagnating. His recent run suggests as much; big scores are few and far between, and the indiscreet shot selection time and again is not doing his – or his team’s – confidence any good.Realistically speaking, he was not in contention for a place in India’s 15-member World Cup squad but not being in the 30-member probables list either – and quite rightly so – is an indication that he needs to have a rethink about his game.He played in three warm-up games against the visiting West Indies and Sri Lanka and although those matches didn’t have List-A status, Chand helped himself to a century and two fifties. But then came a sequence of low scores in the domestic one-dayers – 1, 19 , 11, 3, 2, 6 and 6, making it 48 runs in seven matches.The last of those innings was in the Deodhar Trophy, which means that he was selected in North Zone after scoring 42 in six Vijay Hazare innings for Delhi. Those numbers do not merit selection in the zonal team purely from a statistical point of view, but Vikram Rathour probably picked him on talent alone. He was given an opportunity to prove himself, but how he wasted it; a slash to third man, and gone.If one looks at his first-class average of 35.77 in 32 matches, it’s evident that the selectors think him worthy of a long run in teams like India A or India Under-23s despite a mediocre record in past three Ranji seasons. He scored 268 runs in six matches in the last Ranji season, and was dropped from playing XI in last group game against Karnataka. A season before that fetched him 445 runs in eight matches and prior to that it was 338 runs. For someone who wants to play at the next level, these are not great numbers.His approach in crunch situations can be questioned. Last season, on a green top at Roshanara, he did all hard work to reach 50 before throwing it away against Punjab, when he had all the time in the world to consolidate. In this season’s first Ranji game, he played some flowing drives to reach 28 in no time as Gautam Gambhir seemed to be struggling at the other end. Then he thought of pulling Sudeep Tyagi and was caught at mid-on. Gambhir scrapped and carried on to score 147.Yes, after 56 Test matches, Gambhir has loads of experience, but having batted with him for three seasons, Chand could learn a lot more from his captain about grinding it out.In the second innings, Delhi needed just 16 to win by 10 wickets and get a bonus point, but Chand was bowled by a seamer, his off-stump going for a walk. Delhi missed the bonus point, and one can’t guarantee that that won’t prove costly in a marathon tournament like the Ranji Trophy.Maybe his poor form is all in the mind for Chand, but he certainly needs someone to speak to him about it, be it Virender Sehwag, Gambhir or Ricky Ponting – in the Mumbai Indians dressing room. He needs to convert those pretty 30s and 40s before he starts falling off selectors’ radar.

Shakib joins Imran, Botham

Stats highlights from the second Test between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe at Khulna, where Shakib Al Hasan grabs all the honours

Bishen Jeswant07-Nov-20142 Bangladesh bowlers who have taken two five-wicket hauls in a Test – Enamul Haque Jnr. and Shakib Al Hasan. Both are left arm spinners, both achieved the feat against Zimbabwe, and both at home.31 Years since a player has scored a hundred and taken 10 wickets in the same Test. Before Shakib, Imran Khan achieved this double against India at Faisalabad in 1983. Ian Botham is the only other player to have achieved this feat. Shakib is the first spinner.1 Previous instances of a player taking three five-wicket hauls and scoring a hundred in a three match series. Wasim Akram achieved this feat during Pakistan’s tour to Australia in 1990.4 Players who take a five-wicket hauls more frequently in Tests than Shakib. Shakib has 14 five-fors in 36 Tests. The table below lists the best matches-to-five-for ratio of all bowlers who have taken at least 14 five-wicket hauls (as many as Shakib) in Tests.

Bowlers with the best matches / five-for ratio (min. 14 five-fors)
Player Mat Wkts Ave Econ SR 5 10 Matches / five-for
SF Barnes 27 189 16.43 2.36 41.6 24 7 1.13
CV Grimmett 37 216 24.21 2.16 67.1 21 7 1.76
M Muralitharan 133 800 22.72 2.47 55.0 67 22 1.99
Sir RJ Hadlee 86 431 22.29 2.63 50.8 36 9 2.39
Shakib Al Hasan 36 139 30.94 2.91 63.7 14 1 2.57
HJ Tayfield 37 170 25.91 1.94 79.8 14 2 2.64
HMRKB Herath 57 260 29.06 2.75 63.3 21 4 2.71
TM Alderman 41 170 27.15 2.72 59.8 14 1 2.93
DK Lillee 70 355 23.92 2.75 52.0 23 7 3.04
DW Steyn 75 383 22.56 3.24 41.7 24 5 3.13

9 Years since a Zimbabwe wicket-keeper last scored a Test century. Regis Chakabva scored 101 during Zimbabwe’s first innings. He is only the third Zimbabwe wicket-keeper to score a Test hundred, after Tatenda Taibu and Andy Flower.312 Balls Tamim Iqbal took to get to his century during Bangladesh’ s first innings – the slowest by a Bangladesh batsmen. Tamim also holds the record for the fastest hundred by a Bangladesh batsman, off 94 balls, against England in 2010.21 Innings taken by Mominul Haque to reach 1000 Test runs – the fastest for a Bangladesh batsman. Sunil Gavaskar and Brian Lara also needed 21 innings. The overall record is held by Herbert Sutcliffe, who got to the milestone in 12 innings.2 Number of times Bangladesh have won two Tests in a series. They did this against West Indies in 2009, and now against Zimbabwe. This is Bangladesh’s sixth Test victory, four of which have been against Zimbabwe.

The contradictory fear of the fast bowler

When he was a young and ferocious fast bowler, Len Pascoe wanted the batsmen to be afraid of him. But he also had his own fear. That he would hit someone too badly

Sidharth Monga22-Jan-2015On India’s 1980-81 tour of Australia, gutsy offspinner Shivlal Yadav was told by Rod Marsh: “Lenny is going to keep coming down.” Yadav says he was hit on the helmet, then shoulder, then forearm, then ribs, then the thigh. “When he broke my toe, I understood what Rodney meant.”Question: Could you see the batsman was afraid of you?
Pascoe: Oh I could smell it.Question: Did you like it?
Pascoe: I just didn’t want that bloke to be scared. I wanted the guys in the dressing room to be scared too. If you got him scared that’s it. Often when I took wickets, I would get them in batches. One, two bang. You just hit hard, hit hard.**One month previously, in Sydney, Len Pascoe bounced Sandeep Patil, who wasn’t wearing a helmet. Patil didn’t have the time to react, got front-on, and raised his bat to fend in panic. The ball missed both the gloves and the bat, and hit him so hard on the head it bounced back to where a silly mid-off would have been. Patil fell unconscious, and didn’t move for seconds. He was stretchered off the field, and sent straight to a hospital. That evening Pascoe called up his former captain, Ian Chappell.”So I remember after I hit Sandeep Patil, I had no more,” Pascoe says. “I spoke to Ian Chappell and said I want to retire. I was 32. And I said the game’s not worth dying over. I was worried about what I was becoming. It wasn’t me. I don’t know whether I grew up or the bravado of the fast bowler was stripped. I don’t know.”Pascoe played only three more Tests.**Welcome to the contradictory world of fast bowlers. They want the batsmen to be afraid of them, but they have their own fears, their own demons. Phillip Hughes’ death at the age of 25, in November last year, has only just made it okay to talk about them. If you listen to Pascoe, the fast bowlers have always had fears. Fears they will lose their run-up. Fears they will lose their rhythm. Fears they will hit someone too badly.Pascoe is 64 now. He looks bigger than he did when bowling in the company of Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson. He has a beard that looks like Patil’s current beard. Since retiring he has become a coach. He has worked with Glenn McGrath and Stuart Clark, with Steven Smith and Mitchell Starc. It is hard to believe he coached the metronomes that McGrath and Clark were. Two bowlers who believed in nicking the batsmen out, not hitting them. Pascoe also runs an entertainment business. He can now talk comfortably about the discomfort hitting batsmen brought to him, and why he kept on doing it.Here was a man after whom his club’s hometown named a hospital ward. Every Saturday Bankstown Hospital would receive cricket victims in Thomson-Pascoe ward. That despite being told years later by the groundsman at Bankstown that because of Thomson and Pascoe he used to make incredibly flat pitches. Pascoe was young, he was ferocious, his captains loved him because he could strike fear in the opposition, the fans loved the drama, and the women loved the fast bowlers. There was reason to feel powerful.Hughes’ death might have reaffirmed to us the dangers of cricket, which we had begun to take for granted with the advent of modern protection, but for Pascoe they were always there. He remembers clearly the first time he seriously injured a batsman, South Australian George Griffith. Two bouncers had been pulled away for fours, but the third one got him. Pascoe says he is still haunted by what followed. “He said, ‘Look Len it was not your fault. It was my fault because it was a poor shot.’ But what scared me is what he said next. Only a matter of half an inch either way from where he got hit, he wouldn’t be here today.”I knew he was pretty serious. But you’re young. There were no helmets around. But it always haunted me. When I saw him I said I got to apologise because I didn’t see him in hospital. And he said, ‘No, no, you have nothing to apologise for. I know where you’re coming from.’ And anyway, after that I kind of went surfing and fishing and cricket to me wasn’t my thing.”

“The only way I could get all I wanted was by being a fast bowler. And the person stopping me was the guy 22 yards away. But I didn’t hate him. But the more I got rid of them, the closer I got to everything I wanted out of life. Hating the batsman is not what it’s about. It’s not hate. He is preventing you from what you want.”

Cricket, though, brought opportunities next year, and more dangerous games. When Pascoe next hit a batsman too badly, he remembers, his mate Thomson had only recently lost his former flat-mate, the 22-year-old Martin Bedkober, to a blow to the chest while batting in a Queensland grade game. Pascoe bowled a bouncer in a grade game, to Sutherland’s Glenn Bailey, and hit him in the chest. “And he started vomiting blood, and I go, ‘Oh no…’ And he was taken off the field,” Pascoe says.There was this other time when he had had enough of John Benaud’s statements in the press. “Dion Bourne, the uncle of the Waugh boys, he’s my captain [at Bankstown],” Pascoe says. “And John is on his soapbox. And I just said to my captain Dion, ‘Let him talk about how we should have played the game. Should have declared whatever. Next week, I’ll close his mouth.’ And what happened was, Penrith took half of our players from Bankstown like Steve Small. Benaud was their captain.”The first guy is in. A fellow called Kenny Robinson. I just bowl normal to him, and he gets out. And then Benaud comes to the crease. First ball straight in the throat. He could not talk. We won outright. I went through them. And then we are all having drinks, and I looked at Dion and said, ‘Not much to say now.’ That one was one that I recall, and it could have gone badly as well.”There is a clear sense of feeling powerful when Pascoe is narrating these tales. There is another delightful one. “We are down at Bankstown Sports Club. Dion Bourne [whose nephews Pascoe coached later] and the other guy was Mike Stevenson, who was called Stench. Stench because he was a Pom. Till date he’s still Stench. Dion Bourne’s nickname was Lunch. Because he would have scored a hundred, and he would have had tomato sandwiches in his back-pocket while he batted. And he would come in and eat them. So we got Lunch and Stench. And we are playing snooker.”Thommo’s not a bad player. And Stench says, ‘Oh, you might be better than us at snooker but we’re better cricketers than you two.’ ‘Is that so?’ says Jeff. ‘Tomorrow afternoon, I’ll have two overs, Lenny will have two overs. You bat for four, and we’ll find out who the better cricketers are.'”So we got an umpire at one end just to say that’s out, that’s not out, that’s four and three. Stench goes in first. I hit him from a***hole to breakfast. I made sure I didn’t hit him in the head, but his legs are knocked out from under him. He has got bruises on his bruises. Then Thommo’s come on. Thommo had less idea where they were going than the batsmen did. He lets go at Stench. He has come out looking sad, sore and sorry and says, ‘Righto Dion it’s your turn.’ Dion says, ‘Bullshit, I’ve just declared.’ I had forgotten that but when Dion Bourne died, they told this story.”By the time it came to hitting Patil, Pascoe wasn’t enjoying them as much. “I retired soon after that,” Pascoe says. “Not because I couldn’t play anymore. After Patil, they all built up. And I did not bowl another bouncer to Sandeep Patil. He came into the dressing room and joked, ‘Lenny, I am so sorry for putting my head in the way of your ball.’ And I go, ‘What?’ And he’s got this big bandage on his head. The thing is that it did shake me up quite a lot. It was an accumulation of all these other blows. And you saw how he went down.”**Len Pascoe: “At the level that you are, if you wanted to hit someone you could.”•AFPWhat brought the change, then? After all when Pascoe was younger he was hitting batsmen even though he had known a mate’s flat-mate to have died of a hit.”Because there were things I wanted in life,” Pascoe says. He was the son of an immigrant. His father was a brick carter. Pascoe grew up with racial abuse, being called a wog at school, in the ’50s-60s Australia. He wanted a house of his own, he wanted the luxury to be able to stay in the outdoors that he loved. He had left school. He also wanted to leave brick carting, which did help him attain the strength needed to bowl fast.”The only way I could get all I wanted was by being a fast bowler,” Pascoe says. “And the person stopping me was the guy 22 yards away. But I didn’t hate him. But the more I got rid of them, the closer I got to everything I wanted out of life. Hating the batsman is not what it’s about. It’s not hate. He is preventing you from what you want.”At the time my thinking was, policemen risk their lives, army people risk their lives. And if you are going to be with the best, you have to survive. It is a matter of survival. Did you know that there were four jockeys killed in one year in 2014? There were two water skiers, champion water skiers. Extreme sport. And I put a post on Facebook saying cricket now is an extreme sport. To go in and face somebody from 80 to 90 miles an hour. That’s an extreme sport. In extreme sports, tragedies happen. Hardly a year goes by when a jockey doesn’t get killed.”Once you’ve achieved what you want, you are able to reflect and go, ‘What am I becoming?’ And, I remember saying to Ian Chappell that I want to give it away. And he said, ‘What if he hits you for six? Do you think he feels sorry for you?’ That kind of changed my thinking but I went on to play only one more season.”Bowling fast and risking injuries to the batsmen wasn’t just a ticket out of mundaneness, though. There was a whole package. When asked if he would have reacted differently to hitting batsmen in the early stages of his career had he been born into better means, Pascoe says: “When there’s a young fast bowler, the rest of the team feeds off him. They encourage him. The rest of the team wants to see the other guys scared. Here were a pair of young fast bowlers in Thommo and me. They couldn’t score more than a 110 between them. And here we got these fast bowlers. You are young, and pretty soon your ego gets the better of you. The bravado. You run around in fast cars. You are getting girlfriends. Your testosterone is running high. We are used to seeing batsmen get hit but they always get up. Bit like a movie. And then you see what’s happen to Phil…”

“When there’s a young fast bowler, the rest of the team feeds off him. They encourage him. The rest of the team wants to see the other guys scared. Here were a pair of young fast bowlers in Thommo and me. They couldn’t score more than a 110 between them. And here we got these fast bowlers. You are young, and pretty soon your ego gets the better of you. The bravado. You run around in fast cars. You are getting girlfriends. Your testosterone is running high. We are used to seeing batsmen get hit but they always get up. Bit like a movie. And then you see what’s happen to Phil…”

When he hit Patil, Pascoe was no longer a 21-year-old with girls after him. “I was married, and I had two kids,” he says. “When I am coaching fast bowlers now, I say that the bouncer is an intimidatory delivery. It is a delivery aimed at a batsman much the same as a boxer has to throw a knockout punch. What you can do is learn how to bowl that bouncer properly. For instance, if you are playing on a synthetic wicket with a two-piece ball don’t be a hero and bowl a bouncer at that batsman. That’s stupidity. The two-piece ball is rock hard and you are on synthetic. And it’s going to fly. You should be very conscious of where you’re bowling it and why you’re bowling it.”What then is bowling a bouncer properly? “The first bouncer I would bowl to a batsman would be a fact-finding mission,” Pascoe says. “I will have mid-on and mid-off tell me what his foot movement is. If I bowled a bouncer I’m not there to hit him with it. I will bowl that bouncer over leg stump, and high over leg stump. So that I can see is he going back and across or is he getting cramped. Then I would move my line. The more you go down leg side the finer it will go. The higher you do it, the higher they’ll hit it. As you come more towards off stump, they start hitting you squarer and squarer. If you can detect there is a weakness. Say you bowl a bouncer over middle or leg stump and he’s going back and across and he’s inside, the next one you bowl him is not as high but it is over middle-stump and he’s walked right into it. And it’s cramped him up. You’re setting up a target. Setting him up. This is the level you get to.”**Pascoe wants one thing made clear. He was not just a bouncer bowler. He loved his professional wrestling. “Now that’s where the façade and the World Championship Wrestling come in,” he says. “They all think this is bouncer, bouncer, bouncer, but my best ball was the offcutter. I took more wickets with the offcutter, and took more lbws. I took five in the Centenary Test, and three of them were offcutters. Lbw. Look at my first Test wicket. Tony Greig. Bouncer followed by yorker. Stumps went all over the place.”But Pascoe did aim to hit the batsmen, didn’t he? “At the level that you are, if you wanted to hit someone you could.””And did you fear hitting someone too badly?””Yes, if you hit someone.””Did you always fear hitting someone too badly?””Yeah.””Even when you were young?””It’s funny. You are angry and you want to create fear, but at the end of the day you cool down and want to have a think about what just happened. A bit like wrestling, where you are hitting someone but you are taught to hit them without injuring them.”**There is a Bollywood movie called [Fifty-six So Far]. It is based on police trying to get around loopholes in the law by faking encounters and killing those whom they believe are criminals but are likely to get away if trialled properly. Fifty-six is supposed to be the count of encounter-murders kept by one of the policemen. The main protagonist in the film reflects on his own fears, “It is important to kill, but it is even more important to stay away from the habit of killing.”Now batsmen are no criminals, but with big bats, slower pitches, smaller outfields, better protection equipment, the fast bowler’s world is a bit like that of the conflicted policeman’s. They don’t all show it, but if Pascoe is any indicator, they must all come face to face with that fear.

'Teams can't have set formula' – Dravid

In the first episode of Contenders, a special ten-part buildup to the 2015 World Cup, Rahul Dravid and Graeme Smith discuss the impact of local conditions on team compositions and the issues surrounding the format of the tournament

ESPNcricinfo staff20-Jan-201531:02

Spinners can be effective in Australia – Smith

As the 2015 World Cup in Australia and New Zealand approaches, excitement is building about what the tournament holds. Who are the players to watch for? Which teams start favourites? Contenders, a ten-part ESPNcricinfo special series, examines the strengths and weaknesses of each team in depth, with two legends of the modern game – former South African captain Graeme Smith and former India captain Rahul Dravid. To kick off the series, Smith and Dravid reflect on the importance of a World Cup for a player, the impact of local conditions on team compositions, the issues surrounding the format of the tournament and the likely effects of the new ODI rules on the games.What they said about… Importance of playing a World Cup
Dravid: You want to make a mark in the World Cup, simply because you felt that the best players in the world were playing that tournament.
Smith: I was fortunate enough to play in three of them and never got to win one but have some great memories of those occasions.Memories of the 1992 tournament
Dravid: I had just started playing first-class cricket. One thing that we observed was the players’ colourful uniforms. We used to look at them and think, ‘Yes it would be nice to wear one of those someday.’
Smith: That was my first ever sort of exposure into international cricket. When I was 9 or younger, we used to lie on the bedroom floor, wake up at odd hours of the morning and watch television.Impact of local conditions on team composition
Dravid: You can’t have one set formula. Even if you are confident enough to qualify as one of the top eight teams, you can never predict where your quarterfinal will be. You’ve got to have a squad that covers all bases.
Smith: The unique thing about playing in Australia is the size of the grounds, it’s one thing that most other nations aren’t really used to. You have to put emphasis on scoring singles and running twos and threes.The format of the World Cup
Dravid: You can almost predict who the top eight teams are going to be. There comes a time in the tournament, when everyone starts to wait for the quarterfinals, because you know that those are the big games.
Smith: The experiences I’ve had with the football World Cup and the rugby World Cup is that every weekend, there’s a big challenge, and you’re looking forward to the next game. I think that’s crucial for us to create to keep cricket on the map and keep it competitive.Impact of new ODI rules
Dravid: When you have five fielders in the ring, it’s very hard to play a part-time bowler, you are almost forced to play five specialist bowlers. You’re going to be forced to attack and look for wickets than just sit back for long periods of play and see part-timers bowl.
Smith: You need to sum up the batting conditions with the two new balls in Australia and New Zealand. You need to set more of a platform and you can catch up in the last 20 overs if need be. The key is not to go three or four down for nothing.

Lessons in hurt may help West Indies

Roger Harper remembers West Indies’ one-wicket defeat to Pakistan at the 1987 World Cup

Alagappan Muthu20-Feb-2015When you log in to Facebook from a new computer or a new country, you might be given a security check. The site asks you to prove you are who you say you are before granting access and one way to do that is by recognising your friends/adversaries/competitors from a set of pictures.The World Cup put West Indies through its version of that test and they are struggling to prove they are who they say they are.Kemar Roach just about picked out Scotland in the warm-ups but, in their first group game, a leprechaun disguising himself in a new fluorescent green outfit (minus the shamrock) confounded everyone. By the time Darren Sammy and Lendl Simmons got the hang of it, West Indies were locked out.So maybe it is good that they play a more familiar face on Saturday. They have met only one team more often than Pakistan in 50-over history (and that is Australia). More pertinently, West Indies have won 68 of those 128 matches against Pakistan and an even healthier six out of nine at World-Cups. As comforting as that is, Jason Holder and his men might be better motivated by pain and the urge to not feel it again.Perhaps they should remember 1987. Roger Harper sure does.Lahore. Imran Khan captaining in Imran Khan territory. The hosts were favourites. The visitors were a fading power, at least in one-day cricket. Partisan crowds. The World Cup like never before.The match see-sawed wildly. An Imran special to start. A Viv Richards counterattack for flavour. An Abdul Qadir six for kicks. A dash of controversy from Courtney Walsh and Saleem Jaffer. West Indies had only 216 to defend, but they did it like it was 116. Pakistan needed two runs off the final ball. Nails were torn off, nerves jangled but the noise never ceased.Two taken. A classic. And a heartbreak. Twenty-eight years later, Harper still retains that feeling of disappointment.”The team had just come back in the dressing room,” he said. “Some things were shared about the importance of the match and what it meant to our chances of progressing in the tournament. It was a World Cup and we had fought our way back into a winning position and then just fell short.”As it turned out, they could have made the semi-finals with one more victory; instead, England and Pakistan progressed from Group B.

“We felt that we had a competitive total, a defendable total. And it would have been had we taken our chances”Roger Harper

It might be jarring to inspect those wounds, but West Indies’ class of 2015 does mirror their seniors. Like Sunil Narine, Malcolm Marshall had pulled out of the tournament. Michael Holding and Joel Garner had run their last. It was a new side; a young side seeking to establish their identity and keep up with their history. The 15 men in Christchurch right now preparing to face Pakistan again might empathise with that.”We weren’t as good as we used to be,” Harper said. “But at the same time we had guys who had been around for a couple of years or so. I still thought we had enough talent. Youth was blended in with the experience of Richards, [Desmond] Haynes and [Jeffrey] Dujon. We were confident of getting the job done.”Pakistan were not lacking talent, either, all the way down to No. 7 Saleem Yousuf. It didn’t matter that he was facing Walsh with his tail up. It didn’t matter that he had walked in with his side 107 runs off their target. It didn’t matter that until then he had worn an ODI average of 14.45 with no fifties. It is understandable that West Indies felt “more in control”, according to Harper, but Yousuf’s 49-ball 56 began creating problems. They were compounded by a deafening home crowd and the noise only escalated when he was dropped.”We were looking to get close to 250. Though we fell short, we still felt that we had a competitive total; a defendable total,” Harper said. “And it would have been had we taken our chances. Yousuf was dropped at, I think it was long-on, off Walsh in the 48th over or something like that and it took Qadir in the end to get them through.”West Indies had squeezed out the ninth wicket in the penultimate over and 14 runs were still needed. Then Qadir defied his position at No. 9 by belting Walsh over the long-off boundary midway through the final over. Blood pumping, breath heaving, field closing in on him, Qadir sliced the final ball of the chase – an attempted yorker – to third man and raised his bat in glory even as he was completing that second run.A half-century for a helmet-less Phil Simmons on debut gained a bitter aftertaste; the way he had milked Qadir and took on Imran and Wasim Akram to very nearly match Richards’ strike rate became consolatory praise. Walsh received more press for choosing not to run out a rapidly backing-up Jaffer at the non-striker’s end as he pulled out from bowling the last ball, than for the spell that returned West Indies’ hopes. Four crucial wickets that cut through the middle order and nearly turned the game around. Nearly.

Final lap of the qualification marathon

A look at teams’ chances to make the Ranji Trophy knockouts ahead of the last round

Nagraj Gollapudi and Amol Karhadkar04-Feb-2015The final round of the Ranji Trophy begins on February 6, and five quarter-final spots are up for grabs. Only Karnataka, Delhi and Assam are assured a knockout berth, having secured enough points to top their respective groups. Which could be the five teams that join them? Here is a look at the possible scenarios.

Group A

Teams Mat Won Lost Tied Draw Aban Pts Quotient For Against
Karnataka 7 4 0 0 3 0 32 1.714 3875/96 2943/125
Tamil Nadu 7 3 1 0 3 0 23 1.200 3249/102 2867/108
Baroda 7 1 1 0 5 0 18 1.168 3218/95 3481/120
Mumbai 7 2 2 0 3 0 17 0.955 3052/105 2952/97
Madhya Pradesh 7 1 1 0 5 0 16 1.034 3185/100 3172/103
Railways 7 0 1 0 6 0 16 0.974 2237/90 2577/101
Jammu & Kashmir 8 1 3 0 4 0 12 0.601 2912/125 3452/89
Bengal 7 0 1 0 6 0 12 0.921 3330/95 2854/75
Uttar Pradesh 7 1 3 0 3 0 9 0.661 2172/93 2932/83

Seven out of nine teams are still in the hunt. Sitting second behind Karnataka on 23 points, Tamil Nadu can make it with just one more point in their away match against Baroda. If Baroda win, they will go through, leaving Tamil Nadu to fight it out with other teams. A Mumbai bonus-point win will edge Tamil Nadu out in that case.If Baroda win, six points against Karnataka for Mumbai and bonus-point wins for Madhya Pradesh and Railways will see four teams tied on 23 points. In such a case, teams with more outright wins will finish higher. This would mean that Tamil Nadu and Mumbai will pip the other two teams. Tied at three wins apiece, the last qualification spot will then be decided on higher quotient [(runs scored/wickets lost) / (runs conceded/wickets taken)].

Knockout venues finalised

The BCCI has decided that the Ranji Trophy quarter-finals will be played in Cuttack, Indore, Jaipur and Lahli. The venues have been finalised based on the pitch reports submitted by all the match referees. The semi-finals are to be held in Bangalore and Kolkata, with the final in Mumbai.

But if Baroda were to lose or gain just first-innings points, they will be waiting for the outcome of other matches. If Baroda lose, Mumbai, MP and Railways will all be in the mix to take the last spot from the group. Both MP and Railways have 16 points, and are playing home games against Bengal and Uttar Pradesh, who are at the bottom of the group. Victories will take both to 22, which will then mean that Mumbai and Baroda will also have to win their games.If Baroda secure the first-innings lead then nothing less than an outright victory would be needed for Mumbai, MP and Railways.Bengal have an improbable chance. They will need a bonus-point win, Baroda and Mumbai losses, and also require Railways to not win.

Group B

Teams Mat Won Lost Tied Draw Aban Pts Quotient For Against
Delhi 7 4 1 0 2 0 31 1.533 2693/81 2603/120
Vidarbha 7 2 0 0 5 0 24 1.675 3087/90 2293/112
Maharashtra 7 2 2 0 3 0 20 1.269 3509/104 3058/115
Punjab 7 2 2 0 3 0 19 0.956 3634/111 3286/96
Rajasthan 8 2 3 0 3 0 18 0.821 3203/121 3580/111
Gujarat 7 1 2 0 4 0 18 0.887 3142/98 3651/101
Haryana 7 2 3 0 2 0 17 0.934 2171/110 2429/115
Odisha 7 2 3 0 2 0 14 0.743 2345/116 2531/93
Saurashtra 7 1 2 0 4 0 10 0.634 3204/108 3557/76

Despite an embarrassing innings defeat at the hands of Vidarbha, Delhi are through. But that dominating victory has bettered the odds for Vidarbha, who travel to Pune to play Maharashtra. Both teams have a strong chance; Vidarbha have 24 points compared to Maharashtra’s 20. A win for either will help them finish second in the group. A first-innings lead for Vidarbha will be enough.

Race to escape relegation

There would be plenty at stake for five teams who are in danger of being relegated to Group C. The teams that finish at the bottom of Groups A and B are relegated to the lowest rung.
In Group A, Uttar Pradesh (9), Bengal (12) and Jammu & Kashmir (12) are in the danger zone. Since J & K are done with all their league games, Bengal will only have to avoid losing to Madhya Pradesh to retain their place in the top rung. For UP, the first-innings lead will be enough to pip J&K on the basis of quotient and avoid the ignominy of being relegated.
In Group B, the two bottom-placed teams – Odisha (14) and Saurashtra (10) – will be up against each other in Cuttack. Odisha only have to avoid a loss to save themselves. Saurashtra, on the other hand, will have to beat Odisha if they are to remain in the top flight.

If Maharashtra take first-innings points, they will have 23 and will then need to hope that Punjab, the fourth-placed team, do not beat Delhi in Patiala. But if Maharashtra lose, Punjab can qualify as the third team from the group even with three first-innings points, unless the Gujarat-Haryana match produces an outright winner. A Maharashtra win will make it mandatory for Punjab to defeat Delhi.Also in the mix are Gujarat (18) and Haryana (17), who play each other in Ahmedabad. A win for either could put them in contention, depending on other results. A first-innings lead could be enough for Gujarat if Maharashtra and Punjab lose.Like Bengal, Odisha have a tiny chance with a bonus-point win over Saurashtra, if Maharashtra and Punjab lose, and the Gujarat-Haryana match is drawn.

Group C

Teams Mat Won Lost Tied Draw Aban Pts Quotient For Against
Assam 7 5 1 0 1 0 35 1.315 2596/92 2532/118
Himachal Pradesh 7 2 0 0 5 0 27 1.876 3042/62 3008/115
Andhra 7 3 1 0 3 0 22 1.234 2531/85 2341/97
Kerala 7 1 1 0 5 0 19 0.917 2823/85 3584/99
Hyderabad (India) 7 1 1 0 5 0 17 1.060 3337/79 3745/94
Jharkhand 7 1 1 0 5 0 15 1.094 3287/102 2829/96
Tripura 8 0 3 0 5 0 9 0.635 3368/130 3386/83
Services 7 0 3 0 4 0 8 0.820 2851/102 2659/78
Goa 7 0 2 0 5 0 5 0.664 3237/111 2988/68

Assam, with 35 points, will make their second entry into the knockouts. The race for the other slot from this group will be between Himachal Pradesh and Andhra. Himachal have 27 points while Andhra have 22. But Andhra also have three wins compared to Himachal’s two and that will be decisive in case both teams finish with the same number of points.If Himachal get an outright win or even the first-innings lead in their away match against Hyderabad they will qualify. An Andhra win will only be effective if Himachal lose, or concede the first-innings lead.

The controversies of the World Cup – Mooney's catch, Rohit's no-ball

ESPNcricinfo looks at the controversies of the 2015 World Cup

Alagappan Muthu30-Mar-2015The (un)dead ball
A confusing end to a confusing innings and, as in most passages of baffling cricket, one of the victims was a man who had played with assurance. James Taylor was two runs away from a maiden ODI century against Australia at the MCG – the second match of the World Cup – when he was adjudged leg-before by umpire Aleem Dar. The batsman reviewed, the decision was reversed, and that should have been that. Except England had attempted a run, and DRS rolled on to catch Glenn Maxwell running the last man James Anderson out, and the dismissal was upheld. The only problem – the run-out had taken place after the lbw appeal was upheld, meaning the ball was dead. The ICC conceded as much. “The Playing Control Team spoke to the England team management and acknowledges that the game ended incorrectly and that an error was made.”A jaunt gone wrong
You could excuse Al-Amin Hossain for wanting to explore Brisbane. It was his first time playing in Australia and he was part of a World Cup squad a year after his ODI debut. In his excitement though, he broke the team’s 10 pm curfew and was written up by the ACSU (Anti-Corruption and Security Unit). It was only a misdemeanor, and there were no corruption charges, but Al-Amin was withdrawn from the squad and sent home. “We don’t even know where he went,” Nazmul Hassan, the BCB president said. “That’s the biggest question. He is telling us different versions. It is not a very serious issue but still.” Two days later, Pakistan’s chief selector Moin Khan had to fly home to cooperate with a PCB investigation into why he had visited a Christchurch casino.Sean Williams walked off the park while the umpires were still deliberating over John Mooney’s catch near the boundary.•AFPShadows of doubt
It was the 47th over and Zimbabwe were chasing 332 against Ireland in Hobart. Sean Williams, on 96, cleared his front leg and clubbed one hoping to clear deep midwicket but John Mooney tracked it down perilously close to the rope. Cue the third umpire. And a slew of replays. Some hinted at contact between boot and boundary.Others didn’t. Experts stressed it was just an illusion cast by Mooney’s shadow. The TV official Joel Wilson was still musing but the next man was already taking guard. Brendan Taylor, who made a century in the match, said, “You generally take the fielder’s opinion and you go with it.” Which was what Williams did: after a near-flawless innings, he made the error of walking off the park while the umpires were still deliberating. Zimbabwe could have needed only 26 off 19, but it became 32 off 19 and their best hope had gone.A slow bowler’s swift suspension
Majid Haq, Scotland’s most-capped player and leading wicket-taker, was benched against Sri Lanka after which, according to the BBC, he reportedly tweeted: “Always tougher when your in the minority!! #colour #race.” The tweet was subsequently deleted. The team’s statement said he had breached “an internal code of conduct” but did not elaborate on the specifics. It also said Haq would be sent back home and coach Grant Bradburn said that the decision to drop him was taken for cricketing reasons. Until then Haq’s incredibly slow offspinners had brought him three wickets in four matches, an economy of 4.88 and a rather popular hashtag #things2dobetweenmajidreleasingballanditreachingbatsman.High drama over height
In the glare of the World Cup quarter-finals – with a Bangladesh-India match that was not lacking in eyeballs – the umpires were left red-faced again. Rohit Sharma, who had been the spine of the innings until then and the source of the acceleration later on, lobbed a full toss to deep square leg in the 40th over and Bangladesh erupted. But the square leg umpire Aleem Dar immediately indicated the ball was the above waist and Ian Gould made the no-ball official. Except it wasn’t one, and Bangladesh erupted again – this time in outrage. Nazmul Hassan, the BCB president, wanted to lodge an appeal. ICC president Mustafa Kamal said: “There was no quality in the umpiring. It seemed as if they had gone into the match with something in mind.” Kamal was given a soft rap by ICC chief executive David Richardson who said, “The no-ball decision was a 50-50 call. The spirit of the game dictates that the umpire’s decision is final and must be respected.”

Proactive and hands-on Duminy takes charge

Not just with the bat, not just with the ball, not just while fielding. JP Duminy led Delhi Daredevils with an enthusiastic and energetic approach against Sunrisers Hyderabad

Arun Venugopal in Visakhapatnam18-Apr-2015JP Duminy is among the first to emerge from the Delhi Daredevils dug-out during the innings break. He goes up to the practice wicket and fires away darts from round the stumps. Duminy has probably done enough with the bat already: coming in at No. 3, he has scored 54 off 41 deliveries to push his team’s total to 167. But Duminy thinks there is more to be done. He is proved right.With two left-handed openers in David Warner and Shikhar Dhawan, Duminy waits for only as long as the second over to deploy himself. He also shuffles his bowling pack niftily, using four of them in six overs. Sunrisers Hyderabad have by then zoomed to 50 with all their wickets intact.Duminy brings himself back. The first ball goes with the arm. The result is Dhawan’s dislodged bails. Two balls later, Duminy dives to his right and springs up with the ball, and a cry of delight. He has sent back his opposite number, Warner. This is more Duminy the captain at work than Duminy the bowler. Spreading the field out on the leg side, he had handed out the invite for an easy single or two. Duminy then seals the deal with a generously flighted delivery. Warner twirls his bat too early. Leading edge. End of story.Time for bowler Duminy to recede into the background. Time for leader Duminy to front up. He is chattier than usual, but isn’t animated. Another round of bowling shuffle ensues. Three spinners – Imran Tahir, Amit Mishra and Yuvraj Singh – are pressed into action. Meanwhile, KL Rahul and Ravi Bopara have rebuilt smartly, and are looking to amp up the scoring.Duminy recalls Angelo Mathews, who went for 12 runs in his first over. Rahul jumps out of his crease and mistimes his stroke. Ball gets plenty of hang time. Domnic Muthuswami comes underneath the ball nervously from mid-off, and spills it. Duminy doesn’t say anything. Next ball, Rahul flits across his stumps, a tad too much, and Mathews hits the stumps. Duminy waits till the end of the over, and goes up to Muthuswami and has a quiet word, probably about the drop. Hands-on but not overbearing.The chase, however, is hotting up. Bopara has woken up from his slumber and is tonking them all. Tahir sends back Naman Ojha just before the strategic timeout. Duminy has a hand in this, too, hurling himself forward from point to take the catch. 48 required off 24 balls. Duminy returns with the ball after the interval. Bopara is in no mood for pleasantries and whacks the first ball over long-off for six.Duminy is probably seeing parallels of his own innings here: conservative beginning, gradual gear-shifting and then a sprint in the home stretch. Maybe he also remembers he has carved up Bopara for two fours in the slog overs – including one that nearly rammed into the bowler’s knee – and a six. He didn’t spare Dale Steyn either, slapping a shortish delivery over long-on for six. But Duminy is in no mood for return gifts here and bowls one full and wide. Bopara pursues the lofted shot but is caught at long-off.There is still Eoin Morgan to contend with. No problem, says Duminy as he goes round the wicket. Morgan backs away, is late on his shot, and once again Duminy has found the stumps. Surely, he has done enough now? Not yet, as Karn Sharma and Ashish Reddy lay into Tahir and Mathews.Ten needed off six now. Duminy has saved up Nathan Coulter-Nile, Daredevils’ most effective pacer, for this. There are suggestions coming in from everywhere. Yuvraj joins in, so does Mathews. Even Mayank Agarwal is gesticulating excitedly from the deep. Duminy puts the lid on the panic state and gets back to his fielding post.Coulter-Nile begins well; after two quiet deliveries and Reddy’s run-out, seven runs are needed off two. Karn almost clears the boundary, but Agarwal smartly palms the ball away even as the momentum takes him past the fence at deep midwicket. Another round of meeting ensues, as five are needed off the last ball. Duminy speaks what looks like no more than two crisp sentences. Full and wide again, and Sharma holes out to long off.Fifty-four runs, four crucial wickets at less than six an over and some proactive captaincy. That’s the stuff team owners and fantasy-league addicts dream of. Duminy calls the impact he has had on the match a “blessed thing”. Daredevils now have two wins in a row. Rest assured the streak will extend if Duminy has more such blessed days at the office.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus